
Via Jezebel: Would Kara Walker agree that her success is "a form of oppression"? She certainly seems to have anticipated that notion with her work.
Walker's medium is the cut-out, the silhouette. That medium, to put it plainly, is cheesy. With only a few exception in portraiture, it barely has any history or precedent in fine art. It has some commercial applications—I'm thinking of cartoons, or the zoetrope—but more than anything it falls within a folk category of images. Certainly, it doesn't hang in a traditional hierarchy of media: It's not painting, it's not sculpture, it's not drawing. It's not pedigreed.
So Walker is setting her work up for exploitation. It's folk-ish and it's concerned with black historical narratives, but it's sold and seen by a world that is predominantly white and moneyed. Walker isn't naive to these facts. She's staging her works to be considered in that context. What you see in her work is one narrative, but when you see them—the see-ing of her works—that's narrative, too. And it's a somewhat different narrative from that in her works: A level of institutional critique to add to work that might otherwise come across as resonant but potentially one-dimensional.
Betye Saar never gave her enough credit when she said that Walker sold out black women. At root Walker's images are about the sale of black people—about chattel slavery. What makes them great contemporary art is that their situation makes a similar statement. When you see Kara Walker's work in a museum, alongside the typically white painting and sculpture with which they're inevitably paired, you cannot help but notice those circumstances.
Not every black working artist is going to appreciate or care for this fact about Walker's work, or necessarily agree that her consciousness approach to her situation matters absolves her from potentially playing token in a commercial art world that will only take diversity so far. It's that tension that Henry Thaggert and Jeffry Cudlin had in mind for "She's So Articulate", I think, and it's that tension that both Jessica Grose at Jezebel and Jessica Dawson in the Washington Post are responding to.
To my mind, Kara Walker holds the same controversial ground that Louis Armstrong did in the 1940s and 50s.
Other musicians, most notably his peer Dizzy Gillespie, were uncomfortable with Armstrong's peripatetic relationship with white audiences. Armstrong's performer persona was a minstrelsy shtick that set white fans at ease but simultaneously interrupted the language that white oppressors would use to mock a man like Louis Armstrong. Even Armstrong's critics within the black community would have to acknowledge that even if his humor failed to present a progressive model, he was the leading figurehead of the most subversive, liberationist art form of the generation, possibly even the century: jazz. Walker, like Armstrong, knows exactly what she's doing.
Posted by Kriston at June 24, 2008 11:38 AMI've never understood why such simplistic frameworks-- her representations aren't "positive" enough, by representing racist forms, she allows racism to thrive in the light of day (as if it already didn't)-- have gotten so much traction. It seems to me that these responses are, in fact, the dominant narrative under which black artists are pinned.
But, Kriston, your take on the silhouette isn't totally right, I don't think. After all, one of America's first black artists -- Moses Williams -- the slave (later freed) of Charles Willson Peale, was an assistant in Peale's thriving physiognotrace studio. The physiognotrace (a sort of profile machine) was a portable device which allowed an artist to peer through a lens at a sitter's profile and use a bar connected to the lens to trace the outline of the sitter's (embodied-- not cast by shadow) profile on a canvas or paper behind that sitter. It's speculated that Williams made some of these physiognotraces for Peale; I'd say the symbolic richness of such an encounter is certainly ripe enough non-cheesy context for Walker's work. Williams' own silhouette profile (a rare 18th c. American portrait of a black person) is labeled "Moses Williams, cutter of profiles." Just like in Breaking Away, being a "cutter" means being so much more.
Posted by: sarahb at June 24, 2008 3:08 PMOne difference is that Armstrong played profoundly beautiful music. Nothing of Walker's approaches the artistry of even a weak Armstrong solo.
Posted by: matt at June 24, 2008 8:53 PMThe Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it'll do even better in those areas, but for now it's a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod's strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
Posted by: detox foot spa at May 22, 2010 6:41 AM