Erik Wemple writes about a WaPo style convention I like to call the Rule of Appositives. I use a lot of nesting in my own writing—I have to, since I'm writing about a topic for people who aren't necessarily familiar with that topic, one that has a very particular argot. So bracketed explanations don't bother me: they're efficient. But at the newspaper, the Rule is, where there's a way for an appositive, there's a will for an appositive. Wemple find two examples of things that the WaPo explains that it probably doesn't need to explain—the iPod ("an expensive music-playing device that has become a pop-culture icon") and blogs ("an online update with much of the same news but viewable by anyone with a Web connection"). You gotta assume that some portion of the newspaper's readership overlaps with the percent of the population who made the iPod popular and use the Internet.
Posted by Kriston at April 30, 2007 3:49 PMMaybe you assume too much. For example, your brazen assumption that every common Joe reading your blog knows what the Internet is. If I may:
You gotta assume that some portion of the newspaper's readership overlaps with the percent of the population who made the iPod popular and use the Internet (a vast computer network linking smaller computer networks worldwide, including commercial, educational, governmental, and other networks, all of which use the same set of communications protocols to facilitate data transmission and exchange).
Posted by: m at April 30, 2007 4:48 PM