To this debate between Jonah Goldberg and Henry Farrell, about whether culture is properly considered when evaluating the merits of European welfare states, I'm compelled to introduce a piece of evidence. (Let me catch you up: Goldberg says that France's healthcare system is too teat-suckingly Frrrrrrránch to work on Americans, what with their Protestant ethic and tradition of self reliance. Farrell says this is stupid: a deeply unserious encomium to fixed national values, which are subject to disagreement and rapid change and, in any case, shouldn't be the markers of our destiny. Goldberg clarifies that he alone among the left and right is assigning culture the non-zero significance it should hold in health care policy decisions. Farrell says this is stoopid: a "two-step of terrific triviality".)
Below the cut, then, is an (arguably NSFW) ad from France that someone e-mailed to me:
As far as I can tell, it's legit—a print ad campaign by Aides (a French nonprofit, founded by Daniel Defert after Michel Foucault's death, that promotes awareness and good health). If at all possible, I'd rather not pay tax dollars toward these.
Okay, fine, so this campaign is neither here nor there w/r/t the blogospheric health care debate. But it does really drive home the values divide between colonies and continent when it comes to health, and in particular sexual health.
Assuming it's legit, it's something that, I imagine, wouldn't pass without comment even in gay old Europe. Tres risqué. But not even were real-life, person-sized, sex-hungry insectoids prowling ur MySpaces would you find this warning posted on a Big State campus kiosk. It's not the squicky image that makes the campaign so outrageous—well, not that entirely, or rather not the first-order squickiness of the image.
Bathing the character of good health in white (white skin, white linens, white furniture: white light, white heat)—while painting the sexual predator as darkest ebony—plays on a well-worn, white=good, black=evilbadevil metaphor system. Notwithstanding 300, Katrina news coverage, Imus in the morning, etc., this is a visual that doesn't play in America. At least, not without criticism. Especially when the topic is AIDS, it shouldn't have any purchase: In the States, nearly half of all HIV-infected people are black, 2 percent of African Americans have HIV—the horrifying statistics go on. Phil Wilson, founder of the Black AIDS Institute, says correctly, "AIDS is a black disease, full stock, through all lenses."
In France, however, integration is an enormous social problem, and this ad speaks to a characteristic myopia that traditionalists have on the subject of race. It also reveals a society that's perhaps unclear about HIV/AIDS squares with people. (Not to mention how the virus is transmitted.) Perhaps the less-alarming incidence rates in France makes for a disease that is ultimately more frightening—hence, monsters run amok with a venomous, sexually transmitted disease, rather than people living with a chronic, sexually transmitted infection.
The good things you can say about the ad, however, are the things disqualify it from the American public square. Kudos to the French for showing both a man and a woman enjoying sex. These look like hetero pairings, but hey, I'm no entomologist—there's room for straight and gay alike to be squicked out. However they're doing it, one thing's certain: These people are enjoying sex. Say what you will about arachnids, but spider is clearly getting the job done. And our totally hott monsieur appears to be enjoying some GGG, dangerous, kinky action. Also: man butt! This ad's right out. Stateside, sex and AIDS are fairly graphically divorced. A stars-and-stripes AIDS campaign would encourage you to abstain from fucking bugs until you're married.
Is there a trans-Atlantic message to take away: a message that bridges cultures? Don't fuck bugs? Kids et gosses: Ne baisez pas les bogues. Au moins, pas sans préservatif.
Posted by Kriston at April 11, 2007 11:32 AMNO comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Chris Durant at May 5, 2008 4:54 AMHahaha, you're actually critizing this because the BUGS are BLACK? Come on. You can take political correctness too far, and you can take it several lightyears too far. The point of this ad is, you don't wanna have sex with someone that could kill you. If the Arthropoda in question are darkly colored, maybe that's because you don't really HAVE any 'white' scorpions and spiders. I would find it a lot weirder if they gave the creatures a healthy peach color.
Posted by: Jepser at December 3, 2008 3:34 PMpues practicamente este sociologo pues ten�a un punto muy importante hacia la psicolog�a y adem�s ten�a caracteres importantes sobre ese tema y parace que le gusto mucho eso pues termina decubriendose que era homosexual de mucho que se enfoc� a esta rama sinti� el efecto.
A campaign like this would be about as welcome as a shot of Narcane in the middle of a really nice heroin high here in Australia (where infection rates are also relatively low and social mores about displays of sex seem to be not as conservative as in the US), but not in any way because of the colour metaphors but because of the implications that HIV+ people are horrid, disgusting, poisonous bugs to be avoided and...squashed?
Indeed, Jepser above seems to have picked up on that interpretation well.
The Aids Councils and especially the gay & lesbian community here would be up in arms - and would have every right to be so - considering how much time and effort they have put into tackling fear of and discrimination towards HIV+ people over the years.
I'm pretty certain the average Australian would find a campaign like this deeply offensive on that level, not because people are having sex or enjoying it (there have been plenty of anti-Aids poster campaigns over the years here featuring people, even gay people explicitly having and enjoying sex), but because they are having sex with disgusting poisonous bugs that most people would read as being intended to connote HIV+ people, and certainly not just connoting the virus itself.
I don't know...maybe systems of metaphor, symbolism and connotation work differently in France? but I have to say I am surprised that a campaign like this would come from somewhere as apparently enlightened as France.